Life has a funny way of changing the path we walk. When you first see the headlines to this story you have to say this must be a mistake but it’s not and the family is mad as hell with good reason.
It seems that Palladino has admitted he killed Edwards, 59, after she caught him trying to steal jewelry from her Long Island home. The mother left her only daughter everything but then here daughter died and left everything to the heroin addict husband.
When your personal safety counts
Her Aunt claims that Deanna Palladino, was part of the robbery that led to the murder and took part in an attempted cover-up. Is their a way to change this, I am not sure I guess the sister could dispute the will but that would take allot of legal fees.
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/richest_con_in_the_can_dtw5Nf7ilQ9KhzuSXPDeQK#ixzz19zz5KrjU
Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/richest_con_in_the_can_dtw5Nf7ilQ9KhzuSXPDeQK#ixzz19zyAXpiu
Popularity: 13% [?]
Tags: Robbery, Safety at home, stealing jewelry
To be more accurate, he’s not directly inheriting from his victim. Most states in the U.S. have laws that specifically disinherit a beneficiary who kills the decedent.
He’s inheriting from his late wife, whose death he had nothing to do with.
Obviously, I’d prefer that this money went to someone else, and I’m sure, if she’d had time before she passed, his wife would have changed her will to disinherit her mother’s killer. But that’s not what happened.
Situations like this are quite rare, but maybe the law should be changed to make them less likely. Perhaps there could be a rebuttable presumption that the decedent would not have left any money or property to someone who killed a close relative of theirs.
SFJD recently posted..Commit Murder- Inherit a Fortune